Die Medien in diesem Beitrag werden Besuchern nicht angezeigt. Um sie anzusehen, gehe bitte zum Originalbeitrag.
Yes, no (built-in) AI is now a feature
blog.documentfoundation.org/bl…
Yes, no AI is now a feature - TDF Community Blog
One of the comments on the announcement of LibreOffice 26.8 was a simple question: “So, no AI is now a feature?” LibreOffice does not reject artificial intelligence out of hand, but an office suite used by tens of millions of people – in schools, hos…Italo Vignoli (TDF Community Blog)
Dieser Beitrag wurde bearbeitet. (Donnerstag, 3. September 2026, 16:08)
Tobias Ernst mag das.
wobweger
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf wobweger • • •@wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
It's still coded using AI, same as what Debian just decided to do.
github.com/LibreOffice/core/co…
github.com/LibreOffice/core/co…
github.com/LibreOffice/core/co…
tdf#166391 Add Copy Image button to screenshot dialog. · LibreOffice/core@70c7f6b
GitHubDr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •wobweger
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
😳
merci, good to know,
me is not wanting #salami period
Splinux
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •Worik
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one @wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig That is what generative AI is useful for.
It is very good at generating computer code and will vastly increase the quality of what professional programmers can produce.
That is my experience
Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik @argv_minus_one @wobweger @moskitokoenig Surveys and studies of coders say the opposite:
Generative AI is good at producing text that resembles code and may compile, but the code is unreliable and takes as much work to debug as it would to write it from scratch.
A lot of coders have your experience. Until they actually look at the code it produces.
xyhhx
Als Antwort auf Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith • • •@grvsmth furthermore, many studies have shown that llm users perceive themselves to be more productive than they are, or even perceive productivity gains when instead their productivity is worsened
this of course doesn't acknowledge all the other consequences of llm usage to the environment, cognition, mental health, communities both local and abroad, workers rights, creators rights, global internet infrastructure, etc...
@worik @argv_minus_one @wobweger @libreoffice @moskitokoenig
Nick
Als Antwort auf xyhhx • • •xyhhx
Als Antwort auf Nick • • •@internic @grvsmth hm, actually my original understanding was from this study, i think:
metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early…
but the more recent study suggest a possible improvement, though they couldn't recruit enough developers for a confident analysis:
metr.org/blog/2026-02-24-uplif…
We are Changing our Developer Productivity Experiment Design
METR (metr.org)xyhhx
Als Antwort auf xyhhx • • •Leeloo
Als Antwort auf Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith • • •"As much time"? You're supposed to review the code. That alone takes longer than writing it, and that's before you even start debugging.
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
If AI is producing code of higher quality than what you can write, then that doesn't speak highly of AI; it speaks poorly of you.
As a professional programmer with 30+ years experience, I need tools that work correctly every time. AI only sometimes works correctly, and that's not good enough. I have left many tools behind because they proved unreliable, and this is one of them.
@wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Worik
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one @wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Have you tried using a coding agent in a suitable domain? (They are not original, they are thorough)
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
Of course not. Under no circumstances will I allow one of those things to execute arbitrary commands on my machine without review. I'm not completely insane.
@wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •Worik
Als Antwort auf Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith • • •@grvsmth @argv_minus_one @wobweger @moskitokoenig
I do urge you to experiment with them. It is a mischaracterisation to call them "random text generators".
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
I have, on several occasions.
One that stands out is when I asked a bot (I think Claude Haiku) a question about a programming topic I'm not entirely familiar with. It gave me 10 answers, 4 of which were obviously wrong based on the self-contained test case I presented it with, and 4 more of which immediately proved wrong upon cursory testing.
It was obvious that the bot was just making s**t up and had no idea what it was talking about.
@grvsmth @wobweger @libreoffice @moskitokoenig
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@worik
2 of the answers were correct, so at least it wasn't a complete waste of my time.
But if I got 2 out of 10 questions wrong on a test at school, I wouldn't have been proclaimed a star pupil that everyone else has to keep up with. I'd have gotten an F, and then I'd have gotten a stern talking-to by my parents.
@grvsmth @wobweger @libreoffice @moskitokoenig
Worik
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one @grvsmth @wobweger @moskitokoenig
That is the exact opposite of my experience
You sure that you are not making it up?
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
Well, I just looked over the lengthy transcripts of the chats I had with two different bots on the topic (Mistral and GPT-5.4-mini, as it turns out), and I *was* going to go over them and redact them…
…but then it occurred to me that you're probably just going to have your bot “summarize” the conversations anyway…
…in which case this is a waste of my time, so I'm not going to bother.
@grvsmth @wobweger @moskitokoenig
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@worik
I have, however, gone ahead and saved the transcripts, for my own future amusement and/or to bring receipts to someone who's actually willing to read them. So thanks for reminding me to do that. 👍
@grvsmth @wobweger @moskitokoenig
Lunaphied
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@worik @grvsmth @argv_minus_one @wobweger @moskitokoenig okay it doesn't fucking matter because everyone here sucks but like. Just for future refutations you might get:
You did sort of basically use the most error prone, cheapest, least capable models. Those models mostly just are fancy text substitution. Good for maybe a context sensitive idk swap of pronouns but that's about it.
I think when you're arguing against something strongly it's important to know exactly what it is behind the argument you're making. This doesn't mean you have to use them but a false equivalency doesn't help anything either.
Also, elitism doesn't suddenly become cool and okay when LLMs are in the picture.
Take my input or don't but it's exceptionally frustrating to see the entire conversation on the topic dominated by every party just making shit up it feels like being gaslit
nightoo
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •The devs using it the most are consistently the ones pushing the lowest quality code with the highest number of critical issues. They are also easily the worst engineers overall and I'm watching their skills deteriorate further and further.
Besides, due to token spend they cost us as much as a mamager position.
Worik
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one @grvsmth @wobweger @moskitokoenig
> One that stands out is when I asked a bot (I think Claude Haiku) a question about a programming topic I'm not entirely familiar with. It gave me 10 answers, 4 of which were obviously wrong based on the self-contained test case I presented it
I am curious.
May I have the question? I can try it out here
evgandr
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org I used the one (DeepSeek) at my workplace. While the topic in question (nuances of mocking private/static/final/whatever methods and fields in the class for test) was outside of my expertise — I just read the official documentation for Junit 5, Mockito 5, etc and wrote not so much tests, as it should be — the bot's output was helpful.
Since English is not my primary language, I missed some nuances in the docs, wrote wrong code and, looks like because these mistakes were common for programmers around the globe, the chatbot output contained some necessary for me clues.
But ... when it's time for my main field of expertise or time to dig in some Lovecraftian horrors — the DeepSeek unsurprisingly became unhelpful, unusable and misleading. At the best case it's output just reminds me about Captain Obvious — nothing which I wouldn't tried or knew eons ago 🙂
@worik@mastodon.social @grvsmth@lingo.lol @wobweger@mstdn.social @libreoffice@fosstodon.org @moskitokoenig@dizl.de
Adrien Plazas
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Adrien Plazas • • •@KekunPlazas
Indeed. Because we've observed what happens to other people who are shot with a gun.
Some people, however, seem incapable of learning from the misfortunes of others. Not sure why, but it's terribly harmful to them and to society as a whole.
@worik @wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
wobweger
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik @argv_minus_one @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
from time to time, I visit #slop fan accounts,
they all have below 3 digit followers,
that much their promotion a insane hype cycle is valued here
take the hint and consider switching platform
Dirk Willrodt
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik @argv_minus_one @wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig 🤣🤣🤣
How can the: "here is the stochastic average of the training data" be of better quality?
That is not how LLMs work.
The code quality is shit, especially without rigorous human supervision.
Worik
Als Antwort auf Dirk Willrodt • • •@Garonenur @argv_minus_one @wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
I am speaking from experience, not theory
It is not as simple as "LLMs write better code". But from now on the best code will be aided by LLMs in its construction. That is true now
Dirk Willrodt
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •And no, people using LLMs are deteriorating in their skills so fast, overall code quality (which was shit anyway to begin with) will only go down.
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
I am also speaking from experience, and my experience makes me glad that you and I haven't crossed paths professionally.
@Garonenur @wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •Worik
Als Antwort auf Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith • • •@grvsmth @Garonenur @argv_minus_one @wobweger @moskitokoenig
Golly!
What do you expect when communicating?
It is a shame if you cannot tolerate disagreement
I have no problem with your opinions and POV, I disagree with some of it
For bubbles of agreement I would have stayed on Facebook!
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
What you said was a factual assertion, not an opinion. One that is not supported by available evidence.
Nor is it supported even by theory. LLMs work by making predictions based on statistical analysis of what humans have previously done. Therefore they cannot surpass even the average human, let alone the best.
Which is why I say your admiration of LLMs speaks not highly of them, but poorly of you. It proves that you're below average.
@grvsmth @Garonenur @wobweger @moskitokoenig
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@worik
And your assertion was indeed quite grandiose.
“From now on the best code will be aided by LLMs in its construction. That is true now.” That's literally what you said. Unadulterated arrogance, supported only by vague claims of professional experience that I'm fairly sure you don't actually have (because if you did, you'd have brought receipts).
Perhaps that sort of behavior was welcome on Facebook, but you'll find little love for it here.
@grvsmth @Garonenur @wobweger @moskitokoenig
Worik
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one @grvsmth @Garonenur @wobweger @moskitokoenig
Argumentum ad hominem ignored
I asserted that working on code is what (one thing) LLMs are good for.
I have been watching closely as LLMs and the harnesses have developed and they have astounded me.
There is little useful theory. That "text completion" could do all this is very surprising and I know of no theory to explain it
youtu.be/_MwMLPmMccs?si=RSTP2T… is a short talk by Greg Kroah-Hartman you may find helpful.
Keynote: Linux in the Land of LLMs - Greg Kroah-Hartman & Fellow
The Linux Foundation (YouTube)argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
Your being astounded does not mean LLMs have surpassed humans, only that they've surpassed you.
Anyway, Greg K-H is talking about using LLMs to find bugs, like a static analyzer. That's grand and all, but you're talking about vibe code, and that's not what he's talking about.
@grvsmth @Garonenur @wobweger @moskitokoenig
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Dirk Willrodt • • •@Garonenur
Indeed. LLMs are trained on 100% of everything, and as Theodore Sturgeon once famously pointed out, 90% of everything is crap. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon…
It's a recipe for failure, and sure enough… pcmag.com/news/vibe-coding-fia…
@worik @wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Sturgeon's law - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Worik
Als Antwort auf Dirk Willrodt • • •@Garonenur @argv_minus_one @wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Your comment about their output being shit is two years out of date
These days the code they produce is often very good.
Times are changing, and the development since 2022 has been astounding
The last nine months alone has seen huge advances.
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
More like two days. I frequently get sent slop by my coworkers.
No, it isn't. Not even remotely.
Yes, they are…in that we are speeding into an apocalypse of automated incompetence and consequent project collapse. I now fear deeply for the future, because of people like you.
The last nine months have been catastrophic.
@Garonenur @wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Dirk Willrodt
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •And it sucks.
It reuses old fashioned paradigms, because the old shit is more prevalent in the training data.
AND the users of those LLMs all start to become lazy and just believe what hallucinations the machine dishes them.
Code quality was terrible before, it will only go down now.
Yorci, a hiking picture taker.
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •Adrien Plazas
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik @argv_minus_one @wobweger @grvsmth @moskitokoenig That is not what generative AI is useful for.
It is very good at destroying people, many social contracts, our ability to think, our ability to create, our resources, our environment, all while creating absolute crape no one wants and shoving it to everybody's face, surrendering ourselves to fascist tech giants, and allowing plenty of fascist to be smug about it.
That is my experience.
The Orange 4
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •The Darbscent
Als Antwort auf Worik • • •@worik
counterpoint: ai-sucks-actually.fyi/
AI Sucks, Actually
ai-sucks-actually.fyiCosmin
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one @libreoffice
LibreOffice
Als Antwort auf Cosmin • • •farseen
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Jay Grant 🏳️⚧️
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •@libreoffice@fosstodon.org so you lied about not accepting AI contributions
@cosmin @argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
The Orange 4
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Working Class Games
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •star / nil 🇵🇸 Ⓥ ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🔜 FP
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •𝐩fᵣ
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Have your opinions, share them even. Just check your tone. Don't like the project or code for whatever reason, don't use it. The "anything AI touches is slop" camp seem desperate for an argument and unwilling to compromise.
Tobias Ernst mag das.
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •@pfr
If I wasn't in constant crisis mode at both home and work, then yeah, I'd be looking to make an exit from Linux. I hope things quiet down around here soon, before Linux goes completely to hell.
And yeah, “compromise” is right. With bots inserting code willy-nilly into Linux and no meaningful human code review, there's nothing stopping those bots from inserting vulnerabilities into the software I rely on for my security and safety.
star / nil 🇵🇸 Ⓥ ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🔜 FP
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •rooney (not the famous one)
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •Kai und der Andere 🎗️
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •@pfr "There are good developers who use LLMs.they still produce code that they understand and can debug, and in many cases this approach eliminates bugs more rapidly." No, there aren't, no, they don't and no it doesn't.
@libreoffice @cosmin @argv_minus_one
joepie91 needs more railing 🚅💦 (🔜 eth0)
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •A Bunch of Draculas
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •F4GRX Sébastien ⸚
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •F4GRX Sébastien ⸚
Als Antwort auf F4GRX Sébastien ⸚ • • •thedæmon (Clay Ayers) [he / him]
Als Antwort auf 𝐩fᵣ • • •Flit 🦊 🔥
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •i'm aware the blog post goes in more depth, but i still believe that naming it "no AI is now a feature?" despite *knowing it has AI-generated code* is still incredibly fucking misleading. i was left under a false impression from what people have told me, and now i just know not to trust your word.
also hmm, yes, very professional of you, i'm sure this reply was looked at by multiple people and it wasn't at all reactionary
Ozzelot
Als Antwort auf Flit 🦊 🔥 • • •just like scummvm's neverslop release, which very much has slop
@libreoffice@fosstodon.org
canleaf08 加拿大葉子 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🇪🇺
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •A Bunch of Draculas
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •F4GRX Sébastien ⸚
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •StarkRG
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Oh, look, another former FOSS project dismissing valid concerns.
Alex Celeste, Princess Consort of Burnout
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •@argv_minus_one without passing any judgment on LO cos idk their internal policy;
that commit message is cute, it's like a snapshot of my colleagues six mo ago when they still bothered to read anything it extruded
@wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
Luna Lactea
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •Is there a viable alternative to LibreOffice that hasn't been neglected for fifteen years?
argv[-1]
Als Antwort auf Luna Lactea • • •@jackemled
Not as far as I know. LibreOffice was the go-to FOSS office suite that everybody abandoned everything else for.
codeberg.org/ethical-foss/ai-f…
We thought we had a wholesome non-profit community here. That…does not seem to have actually been the case…
@wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig
ai-free-foss-alternatives
Codeberg.orgLuna Lactea
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •Jacob Alexander Tice
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •🌸 lumi-nhac 🌱
Als Antwort auf argv[-1] • • •Sensitiver Inhalt
Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Carlos Solís
Als Antwort auf Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith • • •withinity
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Violet Madder
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •pri
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •LibreOffice
Als Antwort auf pri • • •Tobias Ernst mag das.
Hardy Erlinger
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •@pri
... and this seemingly quiet movement will only accelerate over the coming years.
Thank you for sticking to your principles. Much appreciated.
Yora
Als Antwort auf pri • • •pri
Als Antwort auf Yora • • •Yora
Als Antwort auf pri • • •@pri That doesn't make it any better.
And would they even know if you save your documents as .doc?
pri
Als Antwort auf Yora • • •Tobias Ernst mag das.
Tobias Ernst
Als Antwort auf pri • •mögen das
PurpleGengar und Centaurea mögen das.
Simon Brooke
Als Antwort auf pri • • •martin lentink 🇪🇺 🇺🇦📎
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Rastal
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •buwel
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •wow.
Thank you.
Angela Scholder
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •ravelin
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •BrownBuilding
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •grosskopfgames
Als Antwort auf BrownBuilding • • •BrownBuilding
Als Antwort auf grosskopfgames • • •Jeff MacKinnon
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •LibreOffice
Als Antwort auf Jeff MacKinnon • • •Yora
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Þommy
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Luis Falcon
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •윤채경 (Yoon Chae-kyung)
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Thankful Machine
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Tom
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Aks
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •This is good. Kudos. Nobody will learn anything otherwise.
remoteControl
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •ranlvor
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •윤채경 (Yoon Chae-kyung)
Als Antwort auf ranlvor • • •@ranlvor Lots of things fall under the "AI" umbrella.
We've had espeak for text to speech on Linux for decades. It's still not very good. Now we have PocketTTS, a 200 MB "AI" model you can run on an old laptop which does a _magnitudes_ better job changing text into speech.
Would it really be such horrible if LibreOffice used small specific local "AI" models where it makes sense because it's such "AI"?
ranlvor
Als Antwort auf 윤채경 (Yoon Chae-kyung) • • •@chaekyung If its a LLM I do not want it. Ever. For whatever reason. And if it downloads 200MB of stuff I do not want to use automatically, I do not want it either.
I'd be ok if a optional extension provides TTS-Services, but it should not enable itself on its own. And it should not be part of the LibreOffice Core.
This is LibreOffice, not a Microsoft Product, it should not install things on its own. It should not decide on itself to burn CPU-Time to do things the user did not ask for (looking at you, Firefox „Tab group suggestions“)
Yora
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •Chao-c'
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Sarah [7252]
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Soulfire the Wolf
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Tobias Ernst mag das.
LibreOffice
Als Antwort auf Soulfire the Wolf • • •Viktor
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •DutchDude
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •I understand that their are issues at Libreoffice, with result that many developers goto #Collabora Office.
So if you want to keep the development, then i understand that Callabora Office (Classic) is better solution then LibreOffice (because the Libre is gone by matter of speaking)
Collabora Office- collaboraonline.com/collabora-…
Collabora Office Classic- collaboraonline.com/collabora-…
OpenOffice become LibreOffice become CollaboraOffice. 👍
Collabora Office
Collabora Online and Collabora OfficeEthan Black :foundation::starting_dvd:
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Keith
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •El Duvelle
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •nflux back in exile
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •윤채경 (Yoon Chae-kyung)
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •It would be wise to look at what's marketed as "AI" on a per case/feature basic.
LibreTranslate really is extremely useful. It's free, runs locally and supports translating between a ton of languages.
A between most languages translation feature would be useful in a office suite, and it doesn't really matter if it's done by a small local "AI" model or not. Text to speech is another feature that comes to mind.
The November Man ☯️🇺🇦🏳️🌈
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Prodigious
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •φαггoт
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •so you're telling me that libreoffice is "Zuzai"? (zuzai.org)
congrats!!
Zuzai, a new word, indicates the absence of AI
zuzai.org💭drauming yver motmæle🗣️
Als Antwort auf φαггoт • • •@parrot I like making words myself, but I have questions.
You mention it is an acronym. What is an acronym for?
When you present a new word, you need to very clear from the getgo what the origin of the word is, what images it leans upon, what meaning you attribute to it. If you don't do this, then the word is going to end up being superficial.
💭drauming yver motmæle🗣️
Als Antwort auf 💭drauming yver motmæle🗣️ • • •@parrot I would drop the part of whether the word is an acronym, retronym.
Do not bring up widespread adoption, future will reveal itself anyways.
Should we be clear what we mean by AI? No, let people judge by themselves what they consider AI, let language live it's life.
Using an existing word? Or using loanwords? Good question, but this just reveals hesitation about your word. You should not hesitate if you are serious.
The text oozes with hesitation. Not a good sign.
💭drauming yver motmæle🗣️
Als Antwort auf 💭drauming yver motmæle🗣️ • • •@parrot
I love that you are chalking the word, spending time on making the text and make a webpage, this shows some committment.
You would benefit a lot from revealing the meaning, the soul, the nature of the word as early as possible. Then show how we can use this word in everyday contexts. Can you think of a meaningful sentence that would showcase the force of the word?
Paint the word for us. Make sure it is not abstract, but something that feels real.
φαггoт
Als Antwort auf 💭drauming yver motmæle🗣️ • • •@vegafjord
wha
i didnt make the webpage i js thought it was cool
but sure ig
Lucas Bentley
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Bravo
Mini24 | AI 工具实测
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Jabic
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Yora
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •Tools specific to the task.
Oenanthe conioides ⁂
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Simone 🤖 & Bruno 🐕
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Simone 🤖 & Bruno 🐕
Als Antwort auf Simone 🤖 & Bruno 🐕 • • •@libreoffice
💭drauming yver motmæle🗣️
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •wasesha
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Ricker M
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •@billyjoebowers I'm confused. I read their post and it implies there is no AI code in LibreOffice currently, but users can choose to install third party extensions that might interact with LLMs.
Edit: oh, I see what you mean.
Michal Špondr
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Radomír Žemlička
Als Antwort auf Michal Špondr • • •Michal Špondr
Als Antwort auf Radomír Žemlička • • •Radomír Žemlička
Als Antwort auf Michal Špondr • • •Michal Špondr
Als Antwort auf Radomír Žemlička • • •Radomír Žemlička
Als Antwort auf Michal Špondr • • •Jan Dytrych🇨🇿🇺🇦
Als Antwort auf Radomír Žemlička • • •Michal Špondr
Als Antwort auf Jan Dytrych🇨🇿🇺🇦 • • •Jan Dytrych🇨🇿🇺🇦
Als Antwort auf Michal Špondr • • •Jiří Eischmann
Als Antwort auf Radomír Žemlička • • •Hint: all of those features came enabled by default, no one asked me as a user.
Jiří Eischmann
Als Antwort auf Jiří Eischmann • • •@Razemix @michal BTW it doesn't stop to amaze me how terrible web Gemini that powers all this is. It bullshits (aka hallucinates) all the time.
The other day I wanted it to help me set up OpenShell. It gave me made-up commands one after another. When I told it to stop bullshitting, it replied: "Sorry, you're right, I actually don't know any OpenShell commands, I assumed they would be the same as podman commands". 🤦♂️
The Gemini models aren't actually that bad, so I assume what is integrated in Google Workspace is very limited to fit into flat rates of like $10-15 per user for the whole service. And at this point, it isn't very useful.
The subsidized tokens gave people false impression that they can get something as powerful as Claude Code, which costs hundreds of dollars a month if you really use it daily at work, in a $15 monthly Office Suite subscription.
DutchDude
Als Antwort auf Jiří Eischmann • • •Bruce Lawson ✅ ♫ ♿ ✌️♂️✊
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •millennial fulcrum
Als Antwort auf Bruce Lawson ✅ ♫ ♿ ✌️♂️✊ • • •Gaël Rostang
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •No palm oil
No gluten
No AI 👌
Corvid Crone
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •LibreOffice
Als Antwort auf Corvid Crone • • •Florian Weber
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •simonwillison.net/2026/Sep/1/c…
Codex bundles LibreOffice
Simon Willison’s WeblogAlexander Vanhee
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •There Is No "Best" Interface, Only the Right Fit - TDF Community Blog
Italo Vignoli (TDF Community Blog)Elma
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •オチュー (stop colonialism 🇵🇸🇸🇩🇳🇨 )
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •star / nil 🇵🇸 Ⓥ ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🔜 FP
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •The Great Llama
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Timothy Wolodzko
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •canleaf08 加拿大葉子 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🇪🇺
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •canleaf08 加拿大葉子 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🇪🇺
Als Antwort auf canleaf08 加拿大葉子 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🇪🇺 • • •Jó Skælettísson
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •