Die Medien in diesem Beitrag werden Besuchern nicht angezeigt. Um sie anzusehen, gehe bitte zum Originalbeitrag.
Our sense of meritocracy
A project that confuses meritocracy with the dominance of a single type of contributor fails to live up to its own values. And a project that bends to the interests of some contributors, at the expense of future generations, is a form of appropriation masked by the language of fairness.
Meritocracy is a complex, multifaceted concept that is worth grappling with in order to build something that future generations will be happy to inherit.
blog.documentfoundation.org/bl…
@tdforg
Our sense of meritocracy - TDF Community Blog
Meritocracy is one of the founding principles of the free and open-source software movement. It is also one of the most controversial terms, and the gap between the different meanings people attribute to it is, in some projects, a source of real and …Italo Vignoli (TDF Community Blog)
Tobias Ernst
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • •mögen das
Jakob Boos und nicolaottomano mögen das.
Café-Junkie
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Etwas mehr Kontext wäre dann gut....
🧐
nicolaottomano
Als Antwort auf Café-Junkie • • •https://forum.linuxguides.de/core/index.php?article/54-libreoffice-am-abgrund-wie-die-document-foundation-ihre-eigenen-gründer-vor-die/
LibreOffice am Abgrund: Wie die Document Foundation ihre eigenen Gründer vor die Tür setzte - Linux Guides Community
Linux Guides CommunityElectropict
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Sensitiver Inhalt
Meritocracy is attractive to those who believe themselves to be meritorious enough to have the right to decide who else shall be considered meritorious. Not so much to people who are used to being considered unmeritorious, or just have an interest in democracy.
I did try to read the blog, but since the page consisted solely of a rather stylish spinning graphic I have to assume that I am not considered sufficiently meritorious to even read your thoughts on the subject. 🤷
WombatDhampir
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Jan Bonekamp
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Jakob Boos
Als Antwort auf Jan Bonekamp • • •@PorotoCampo
@libreoffice @tdforg
they are talking about Collabora.
Tobias Ernst
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • •428
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •@tdforg
Jakob Boos
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •@tdforg
Plesse find a solution to Ende this conflict.
Jakob Boos
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •@nicolaottomano
@CollaboraOffice
Collabora has less functionality compared with LibreOffice.
Tobias Ernst
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • •Tobias Ernst
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • •nicolaottomano mag das.
nicolaottomano
Als Antwort auf Jakob Boos • • •-It has a modern UI, which make it a smoother switch to people familiar with MS Office.
-Collabora Desktop and Web UIs are the same, so users don't have to learn two different tools.
-90% of people won't ever need the advanced functionalities. The other 10% could stay on MSO or OnlyOffice.
Vasily "Vaz" Différence
Als Antwort auf LibreOffice • • •Jakob Boos
Als Antwort auf nicolaottomano • • •@nicolaottomano @CollaboraOffice
I agree with you, but ...
You know, that OnlyOffice sources have their origin in Russia? For me, that's the main problem with OnlyOffice and the reason to completely switch to LibreOffice and Collabora (in my Nextcloud instance),
But the new Euro-Office initiative is very interesting. I hope that the legal conflict there could be solved.
nicolaottomano
Als Antwort auf Jakob Boos • • •